🚨Opening Playbook is off today🚨
But join Alex at 10:30 AM ET and find out how we’ll use Oracle to track massive sneaky bets! [tap to join]
Something strange is happening in the market right now.
We all thought the AI boom would be a rising tide that lifted all boats. You know the story — invest in the picks and shovels, the infrastructure plays and the companies supporting the biggest AI winners.
But that’s not what’s playing out.
Instead, AI itself has become a pure moonshot play — a risk-on bet investors are willing to take. Everything below that level is facing a confidence problem.
And I think that’s the word that sums up the market best right now: confidence. Or more accurately, the lack of it.
If I were managing $100 billion, I’d probably allocate some capital to the AI upside. But everything else looks like risk without enough potential reward.
Those other plays still have Iran, tariffs and inflation to contend with, and there’s no obvious payoff for taking on that uncertainty.
The Lopsided Trade
This might explain why AI’s upside hasn’t spread into the assets traders expected to follow it.
We assumed semiconductors, data centers and cloud providers would all march higher in lockstep. Instead, the market is treating AI as a special case — a bet on a future so transformational that it’s worth the risk.
Part of the problem is that AI investment doesn’t automatically circulate through the broader economy.
A car salesperson who earns a commission isn’t turning around and buying an Nvidia (NVDA) chip. The money pouring into AI can remain concentrated among a small group of companies rather than creating confidence everywhere else.
Even within technology, the divergence is striking. Compare the Technology Sector (XLK) with a concentrated basket of the Magnificent Seven (MAG7) and you’ll see very different charts.
That tells me this isn’t necessarily a broad technology boom. It’s a narrow trade led by a handful of dominant names.
We’ve also seen assets interact in ways I never would’ve expected.
Technology, gold and silver have shifted between risk-on and risk-off behavior in unusual ways. Those changing relationships make it harder to know what really offers protection and reinforce the broader confidence problem.
There’s a historical parallel here.
During the dot-com era, investors talked about the “Four Horsemen” — a small group of technology leaders that carried much of the market’s enthusiasm. AI may be creating a similar concentration today.
That doesn’t mean the outcome has to be the same, but it does show how transformative narratives can pull capital toward a few perceived winners while leaving the rest of the market behind.
Where’s the Confidence?
I think it’s a good trading environment, but the investing environment is uniquely uncertain. It’s hard to identify an area where you can have medium- or long-term confidence because everything feels conditional.
AI works — as long as the narrative holds. Defensives work — until they don’t. Value works — maybe, but only if rates cooperate.
For me, it’s about trading the environment we’re in, not the one we wish we had. That means shorter holding periods, tighter risk management and a willingness to pivot when the setup changes.
Until confidence returns to the broader market, I’m not looking to plant long-term flags. I’m looking to trade what’s working.
Now don’t forget to join us at 10 a.m. ET weekdays for Opening Playbook, and at 3:30 p.m. ET Closing Playbook!
Nate Tucci
Tucci Trades
Follow along and join the conversation for real-time analysis, trade ideas, market insights and more!
- Telegram:https://t.me/nate_tucci
- YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/@NewMoneyCrew
Important Note: No one from the New Money Crew team or Tucci Trades will ever contact you directly on Telegram.
*This is for informational and educational purposes only. There is inherent risk in trading, so trade at your own risk.
