The 1998 Pattern Everyone’s Talking About — and Why This Time Feels Different

by | Sep 16, 2026

🚨 I’ll be live at 9 a.m. ET🚨

Fed Day is HERE: There’s a 94.5% chance for a hike and we have triple witching OPEX Friday so expect volatility. Will the US10Y top out at 5%? Will the bond vigilantes back off? Let’s discuss that and more [tap to join us for the Daily Profit Plan]!

 

I’ve been thinking a lot about market patterns lately, and one comparison keeps coming up in conversations I’ve had: 1998.

That year gave us something memorable — the market climbed steadily before experiencing a sharp correction, then rallied powerfully into the year-end. It was wild.

And right now, there are some eerie similarities worth watching…

But here’s where I want to be careful. This isn’t 1998 — we’re looking at a completely different market environment nearly 30 years later. Historical patterns can offer a framework for potential scenarios, but the risks we’re facing now are fundamentally different.

The Risks That Didn’t Exist in 1998

Let’s start with what’s changed. Back in 1998, we didn’t have the debt dynamics we’re dealing with now. The bond market is signaling growing concern about U.S. debt, and that’s not something you can ignore.

When interest on the debt becomes one of the largest items in the federal budget — sitting alongside defense spending, Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security — history tells us the pressure can become destabilizing.

That pressure also raises the possibility of creative fiscal or monetary responses. Policymakers could extend maturities, change how obligations are financed, tolerate higher inflation or pursue a broader financial reset.

I don’t know what that response will look like, but markets can move quickly when investors anticipate a change in the rules.

The Federal Reserve is another variable. Its path depends partly on inflation improving and energy costs remaining contained. If oil moves toward $100 a barrel or diesel approaches $7 a gallon, inflation could remain stubborn and limit the Fed’s ability to cut rates.

Some of the most important inputs are beyond its control.

Then there’s the global factor. In 2024, the Japanese yen strengthened rapidly from roughly 160 to 140 against the dollar as yen-funded carry trades unwound. That disruption coincided with a correction in the S&P 500 and a much steeper decline in the Nikkei 225. Another sharp unwind could spill into global equities again.

The Scenario That Still Makes Sense

Despite these modern risks, I still think there’s a version of this trade that mirrors the 1998 framework. If the comparison holds, be prepared for a volatility event — not necessarily a repeat of the exact path, but a rapid repricing that tests positioning and conviction.

That doesn’t automatically end the bullish case. As in 1998, a sharp correction could eventually reverse and push the market back toward its highs, creating a broadening pattern with significant volatility, buying opportunities and gains for disciplined traders.

The key is preparing for both scenarios. Don’t dismiss the historical parallel, but don’t ignore the structural differences either. This market has given us a pattern worth respecting, wrapped in risks that require active management and strategic positioning.

I’m watching this closely, and I think you should be too.

I’ll see you in the markets.

Chris Pulver
Chris Pulver Trading 

Follow along and join the conversation for real-time analysis, trade ideas, market insights and more!

Important Note: No one from the ProsperityPub team or Chris Pulver Trading will ever contact you directly on Telegram.

*This is for informational and educational purposes only. There is inherent risk in trading, so trade at your own risk. 

P.S. The No. 1 Ticker Helping Me Target Overnight Payouts

A unique pattern on the exact same ticker has handed us multiple 2x overnight opportunities this month.

Tune in at 11:30 a.m. ET to see what it is…

And how we’re going after the next trade!

Join Today’s Class

What to read next